SORRENTINO: DEFENDING THE INDEFENSIBLE !!!!
SORRENTINO: DEFENDING THE INDEFENSIBLE !!!! The Abortion Question????????
The intentional killing of innocent human beings is never justified.
The human being in the mother's womb is not the property of the mother-no human
being is the property of any other human being. We are all properties of the Creator.
https://www.providencejournal.com/opinion/20200701/my-turn-mary-ann-sorrentino-abortion-question-has-been-lsquoasked-and-answeredrsquo-by-high-court
She headlines her article with:
"Abortion question has been 'asked and answered' by high court" NOOOOOOOOOOOO.
That's the problem ,the high court never asked the right question and therefore never
answered the abortion question.
The abortion question that should be asked and was never asked by the high court even
in R vW.is:
"That living organism growing in the mother's womb,that came about when the human
male sperm fertilized the human female egg,is that a living human being organism??????"
If it is, then it comes under the protection of the US CONSTITUTION.
If it isn't,then you can go on killing it by abortion.
That human being growing in the female womb has human being DNA which makes it a
human being and a "person" under the US Constitution.
COMMENTARY
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roe_v._Wade#Opinion_of_the_Court
https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1GGRV_enUS794US794&sxsrf=ALeKk02nq2lp79i16AqmUJcpjlNw97bCkQ:1594130256534&q=roe+v+wade+unconstitutional&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj38Kn9pbvqAhWvmHIEHV3DBtwQ1QIoBHoECAwQBQ&biw=1109&bih=564
SUPREME IGNORANCE
"We need not resolve the difficult question of when life begins. When those trained in the respective disciplines of medicine, philosophy, and theology are unable to arrive at any consensus, the judiciary, in this point in the development of man's knowledge, is not in a position to speculate as to the answer."
The intentional killing of innocent human beings is never justified.
The human being in the mother's womb is not the property of the mother-no human
being is the property of any other human being. We are all properties of the Creator.
https://www.providencejournal.com/opinion/20200701/my-turn-mary-ann-sorrentino-abortion-question-has-been-lsquoasked-and-answeredrsquo-by-high-court
She headlines her article with:
"Abortion question has been 'asked and answered' by high court" NOOOOOOOOOOOO.
That's the problem ,the high court never asked the right question and therefore never
answered the abortion question.
The abortion question that should be asked and was never asked by the high court even
in R vW.is:
"That living organism growing in the mother's womb,that came about when the human
male sperm fertilized the human female egg,is that a living human being organism??????"
If it is, then it comes under the protection of the US CONSTITUTION.
If it isn't,then you can go on killing it by abortion.
That human being growing in the female womb has human being DNA which makes it a
human being and a "person" under the US Constitution.
COMMENTARY
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roe_v._Wade#Opinion_of_the_Court
https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1GGRV_enUS794US794&sxsrf=ALeKk02nq2lp79i16AqmUJcpjlNw97bCkQ:1594130256534&q=roe+v+wade+unconstitutional&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj38Kn9pbvqAhWvmHIEHV3DBtwQ1QIoBHoECAwQBQ&biw=1109&bih=564
SUPREME IGNORANCE
"We need not resolve the difficult question of when life begins. When those trained in the respective disciplines of medicine, philosophy, and theology are unable to arrive at any consensus, the judiciary, in this point in the development of man's knowledge, is not in a position to speculate as to the answer."
— Roe, 410 U.S. at 159.