GINSBERG:PROMOTED ABORTING BABY WOMEN IN THE WOMB
GINSBERG:PROMOTED ABORTING BABY WOMEN IN THE WOMB
Ginsberg is being praised for her promotion of women's rights.
Has anyone asked her directly "What's that living organism growing in the the mothers womb????"
Is it a dog,a cat,a giraffe,a rhinoceros? If she doesn't know then do a DNA test on that aborted
thing that was just murdered,killed,aborted!! The DNA will be human being DNA!!!!!!!!!
Ginsberg doesn't support all woman. She doesn't support or protect the baby women in the
womb. She supported and promoted the murder,killing,aborting baby women in the womb!!!!!!
Abortion is the intentional and deliberate killing of baby women in the womb!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
A DNA test on the aborted organism will show it to be a baby woman human being!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
GINSBERG::ABORTION
Abortion rights
Ginsburg discussed her views on abortion and gender equality in a 2009 New York Times interview, in which she said about abortion "[t]he basic thing is that the government has no business making that choice for a woman."[74] Although Ginsburg consistently supported abortion rights and joined in the court's opinion striking down Nebraska's partial-birth abortion law in Stenberg v. Carhart, 530 U.S. 914 (2000), on the 40th anniversary of the court's ruling in Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), she criticized the decision in Roe as terminating a nascent democratic movement to liberalize abortion laws which might have built a more durable consensus in support of abortion rights.[75] Ginsburg was in the minority for Gonzales v. Carhart, 550 U.S. 124 (2007), a 5–4 decision upholding restrictions on partial birth abortion. In her dissent, Ginsburg opposed the majority's decision to defer to legislative findings that the procedure was not safe for women. Ginsburg focused her ire on the way Congress reached its findings and with the veracity of the findings.[76] Joining the majority for Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt, 579 U.S. 15-274 (2016), a case which struck down parts of a 2013 Texas law regulating abortion providers, Ginsburg also authored a short concurring opinion which was even more critical of the legislation at issue.[77] She asserted the legislation was not aimed at protecting women's health, as Texas had said, but rather to impede women's access to abortions.[76][77]
